Plaintiff alleges beverage company misleads consumers with false health benefit claims


U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York | Official Website

Jordan Somers has taken legal action against a popular beverage company, alleging that its marketing claims about the health benefits of its prebiotic sodas are misleading. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on December 17, 2025, targeting Olipop, Inc. Somers argues that Olipop's assertions regarding their product's ability to support digestive health are deceptive and do not deliver the promised benefits.

The lawsuit contends that while Olipop promotes its sodas as containing beneficial prebiotics that support digestive health, the actual amount of prebiotic fiber present in each can is insufficient to provide any real health benefits. According to Somers, consumers would need to consume at least two cans daily for a month to see any positive effects from the prebiotics. However, this would also mean ingesting an additional 10 grams of sugar per day, which could negate any potential health benefits and potentially harm digestive health instead. "These products are basically sugared water," a nutritionist quoted in the case remarked, underscoring the plaintiff's argument.

Somers has purchased Olipop products multiple times and relied on their labeling claims when making his purchases. He asserts that had he known these claims were misleading, he either would not have bought them or would have paid less. The lawsuit highlights violations of New York General Business Law §§ 349 and 350 concerning deceptive acts and false advertising. It seeks class-action status for all similarly affected consumers who purchased Olipop products under these pretenses.

The complaint calls for several forms of relief from the court: certification of the class action, statutory damages determined by court or jury, prejudgment interest on awarded amounts, an injunction against Olipop’s current marketing practices with a corrective advertising campaign mandate, and coverage of attorney fees and litigation costs. The case emphasizes how widespread deceptive marketing practices can mislead consumers into believing they are purchasing healthier options than they actually are.

Representing Jordan Somers is attorney Joshua D. Arisohn from Arisohn LLC based in Litchfield, Connecticut. The case ID is 1:25-cv-06933 with proceedings overseen by judges within the Eastern District of New York.

Source: 125cv06933_Somers_v_Olipop_Inc_Complaint_Eastern_District_New_York.pdf

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Local

The King is Back in the South Shore Press

The legendary Long Island journalist Karl Grossman’s latest column.


Sports

Don't Expect Bregman to Pay Off

This week, one of the bigger names in the free agency cycle signed with the Chicago Cubs, and fantasy managers everywhere sighed. Usually, anyone heading to Wrigley Field is viewed as a positive, but for Alex Bregman, more information has emerged suggesting this move could spell trouble for his fantasy outlook. Bregman is a right-handed pull hitter who previously played in two of the more favorable home parks for that profile in Houston and Boston. Both parks feature short left-field dimensions that reward pulled fly balls and help inflate power numbers.


Sports

Futures Bettors Will Be Smiling

The College Football Championship is set, and it pits two of the more unlikely teams against each other. Indiana may have the largest living alumni base in the country, with more than 800,000 graduates, but few expected the Hoosiers to reach this stage. They feature zero five-star recruits and have instead relied on depth, discipline, and consistency while dominating all season long.