Argonaut Insurance sues Midea and Electrolux saying defective dehumidifier caused fire


Attorney Richard L. Elem of Murphy Sanchez PLLC | Murphy Sanchez PLLC

Argonaut Insurance Company has filed a lawsuit against two major corporations, alleging that their defective product caused significant property damage. The lawsuit names Midea America Corp. and Electrolux Home Products, Inc. as defendants.

According to the complaint, Argonaut Insurance Company is acting as a subrogee for 138 6th Avenue Condominium in Brooklyn, New York. They claim that a dehumidifier manufactured by Midea and/or Electrolux malfunctioned and caught fire on July 1, 2023. This incident allegedly resulted in damages amounting to $268,526.13. According to the complaint, the dehumidifier was purchased by either the condominium or its tenant, Mary Lynn Hodenfield. The insurance company argues that prior recalls had been issued for similar Midea-manufactured dehumidifiers due to risks of overheating and catching fire.

The lawsuit outlines several causes of action against the defendants: negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, and violation of the New York Consumer Fraud Act. In terms of negligence, Argonaut accuses Midea and Electrolux of failing in their duty to manufacture safe products. The complaint states that "Defendants were negligent in manufacturing, importing, selling and/or distributing the dehumidifier," which led to substantial financial loss for Argonaut.

Under strict liability claims, Argonaut asserts that the defendants are responsible for placing a dangerously defective product into commerce without adequate warnings or instructions. The filing highlights various defects, such as design flaws and component issues that allegedly existed when the dehumidifier left the manufacturers' control.

Regarding breach of warranty claims under the Universal Commercial Code (UCC), Argonaut alleges that Midea and Electrolux failed to provide a product fit for its intended purpose. They also accuse the companies of breaching express warranties related to the dehumidifier's safety and functionality.

Finally, Argonaut contends that both companies engaged in deceptive practices under the New York Consumer Fraud Act by marketing their product as safe despite known risks. As stated in the document: "Defendants’ actions...constitutes an express misrepresentation."

Argonaut seeks compensatory damages totaling $268,526.13 from both defendants, along with costs incurred during litigation and reasonable attorney’s fees. They also demand any additional relief deemed appropriate by the court.

Argonaut Insurance Company is represented by attorney Richard L. Elem of Murphy Sanchez PLLC. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under Case ID 1:25-cv-01479.

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Local

The King is Back in the South Shore Press

The legendary Long Island journalist Karl Grossman’s latest column.


Sports

Don't Expect Bregman to Pay Off

This week, one of the bigger names in the free agency cycle signed with the Chicago Cubs, and fantasy managers everywhere sighed. Usually, anyone heading to Wrigley Field is viewed as a positive, but for Alex Bregman, more information has emerged suggesting this move could spell trouble for his fantasy outlook. Bregman is a right-handed pull hitter who previously played in two of the more favorable home parks for that profile in Houston and Boston. Both parks feature short left-field dimensions that reward pulled fly balls and help inflate power numbers.


Sports

Futures Bettors Will Be Smiling

The College Football Championship is set, and it pits two of the more unlikely teams against each other. Indiana may have the largest living alumni base in the country, with more than 800,000 graduates, but few expected the Hoosiers to reach this stage. They feature zero five-star recruits and have instead relied on depth, discipline, and consistency while dominating all season long.