GEICO sues R Family pharmacy for alleged $2M no-fault insurance fraud scheme


United States District Judge Nicholas Garaufis | United States Government (Wikipedia Commons)

Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and its affiliates have filed a lawsuit accusing R Family Pharmacy Inc., Jack Kabariti, and unnamed defendants of a fraudulent scheme involving over $2 million in deceptive pharmaceutical billing.

According to the complaint, the defendants orchestrated a large-scale fraud operation exploiting GEICO's "No-Fault" insurance system by submitting inflated claims for expensive topical prescription drugs like Diclofenac Gel 3% and Lidocaine 5% Ointment. These medications were allegedly dispensed without genuine patient care considerations to individuals involved in automobile accidents covered by GEICO policies. The scheme reportedly began in 2022 when Kabariti partnered with various entities involved in No-Fault insurance fraud to steer unnecessary prescriptions to R Family Pharmacy.

The complaint further alleges that illegal collusive arrangements were made with healthcare providers and unlicensed individuals controlling multidisciplinary medical clinics. These clinics predominantly treated No-Fault patients and directed large volumes of prescriptions for the targeted pharmaceuticals to R Family Pharmacy. The pharmacy is accused of inflating charges submitted to GEICO by acquiring these products at low cost but billing them at exorbitant prices. Nearly 97% of the pharmacy's billing was for these specific products, with charges reaching $2,359 per prescription for Diclofenac Gel 3% and $1,904.75 per prescription for Lidocaine 5% Ointment.

GEICO seeks restitution of approximately $105,844 already paid out due to this alleged fraud and a declaration that it is not obligated to pay over $1.7 million in pending claims submitted through R Family Pharmacy. The insurer argues that these claims are fraudulent as they were billed under predetermined protocols aimed at financial exploitation rather than patient care. Additionally, GEICO asserts that the defendants engaged in illegal relationships involving kickbacks and financial incentives to ensure prescriptions were steered their way.

The case highlights broader issues within New York's No-Fault insurance laws designed to facilitate quick payment for necessary medical services following car accidents. However, as noted in the complaint, pharmacies can be held liable for medically unnecessary services billed under such systems if found complicit in fraudulent activities.

GEICO is represented by attorneys Michael A. Sirignano and Barry I. Levy from Rivkin Radler LLP. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under Case ID 1:25-cv-01217 and is being overseen by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis.

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Local

The King is Back in the South Shore Press

The legendary Long Island journalist Karl Grossman’s latest column.


Sports

Don't Expect Bregman to Pay Off

This week, one of the bigger names in the free agency cycle signed with the Chicago Cubs, and fantasy managers everywhere sighed. Usually, anyone heading to Wrigley Field is viewed as a positive, but for Alex Bregman, more information has emerged suggesting this move could spell trouble for his fantasy outlook. Bregman is a right-handed pull hitter who previously played in two of the more favorable home parks for that profile in Houston and Boston. Both parks feature short left-field dimensions that reward pulled fly balls and help inflate power numbers.


Sports

Futures Bettors Will Be Smiling

The College Football Championship is set, and it pits two of the more unlikely teams against each other. Indiana may have the largest living alumni base in the country, with more than 800,000 graduates, but few expected the Hoosiers to reach this stage. They feature zero five-star recruits and have instead relied on depth, discipline, and consistency while dominating all season long.