Homeowners accuse cell tower developer and local government of violating zoning laws


Margo Brodie, Chief Judge with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York | Administrative Office of the United States Courts | Wikipedia Commons

A group of homeowners has filed a lawsuit against a cell tower developer and local government, alleging they conspired to bypass zoning laws to construct a cell tower near residential properties. 

On December 31, 2024, Joanne Romano and several other plaintiffs filed the complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against Elite Towers, L.P., and the Town of Riverhead.

The plaintiffs, represented by Campanelli & Associates, P.C., claim that Elite Towers plans to build a 213-foot cell tower just 50 feet from Romano’s home in Wading River, New York. 

The proposed construction allegedly violates provisions of the Riverhead Zoning Code, including height restrictions and setback requirements. The plaintiffs argue that the tower poses safety risks, such as ice fall and structural failure, and could lower property values due to aesthetic impacts. 

"Would I want this thing near my home? No," said Tim Hubbard, a town official named in the suit, acknowledging the project’s intrusive nature.

The complaint centers on allegations that Elite Towers colluded with members of the Town Board to avoid public hearings before the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), which are required under New York State law to allow residents to voice concerns about zoning variances. 

Instead, the lawsuit claims that Elite Towers encouraged town officials to conduct an unauthorized Monroe Balancing Test, a method typically used to resolve disputes between municipalities, to justify bypassing zoning requirements without proper authorization.

The plaintiffs assert that these actions violated state and federal laws, including First Amendment rights, by silencing community opposition and denying their right to petition government bodies. They seek relief under 42 U.S.C. §1983 for constitutional violations and demand compensatory damages and injunctive relief to halt construction until the proper procedures are followed.

The lawsuit also includes state law claims under CPLR Article 78 and CPLR §3001, seeking judicial review of what the plaintiffs describe as arbitrary actions by town officials. They request declaratory judgments annulling any decisions made by the Town Board regarding the tower’s approval.

Andrew J. Campanelli of Campanelli & Associates, P.C., represents the plaintiffs. No attorneys for Elite Towers or individual town officials have been named in the filing. The case is identified as 2:24-cv-08910.

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Local

The King is Back in the South Shore Press

The legendary Long Island journalist Karl Grossman’s latest column.


Sports

Don't Expect Bregman to Pay Off

This week, one of the bigger names in the free agency cycle signed with the Chicago Cubs, and fantasy managers everywhere sighed. Usually, anyone heading to Wrigley Field is viewed as a positive, but for Alex Bregman, more information has emerged suggesting this move could spell trouble for his fantasy outlook. Bregman is a right-handed pull hitter who previously played in two of the more favorable home parks for that profile in Houston and Boston. Both parks feature short left-field dimensions that reward pulled fly balls and help inflate power numbers.


Sports

Futures Bettors Will Be Smiling

The College Football Championship is set, and it pits two of the more unlikely teams against each other. Indiana may have the largest living alumni base in the country, with more than 800,000 graduates, but few expected the Hoosiers to reach this stage. They feature zero five-star recruits and have instead relied on depth, discipline, and consistency while dominating all season long.