Lawsuit filed over alleged patent infringement in quartz manufacturing


U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York | Official Website

A patent dispute is underway in the Eastern District of New York, where a Florida-based company has accused a New York firm of infringing on its patent. 

On December 6, 2024, SQIP, LLC filed a complaint against Ultra Stones, LLC, alleging willful infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 10,376,912. The case centers on alleged unauthorized activities involving Ultra Stones' products that violate SQIP’s patented methods for manufacturing engineered quartz surfaces.

SQIP, LLC, based in Orlando, Florida, claims ownership of a significant portfolio of patents related to engineered natural quartz surface products used in various building applications, including countertops. 

The ‘912 Patent specifically covers an innovative method for depositing color into cracks of moving-formed quartz slabs to create veins in engineered stone. Alex Xie, the sole inventor and member of SQIP, is credited with the innovation and holds extensive experience in the industry. 

According to the complaint, Ultra Stones has been manufacturing and selling products under names such as "Waterlily," "Venato Ultra," "Afina," "Calacatta Valence," and "Zermat," which infringe upon the patent.

The legal filing details how Ultra Stones was made aware of the alleged infringement as early as January 30, 2023. Despite receiving notification from SQIP’s counsel through letters dated January 30 and February 7, 2023—neither of which received a response—Ultra Stones continued its allegedly infringing activities. 

The plaintiff accuses Ultra Stones not only of violating patent laws under sections 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) and § 271(g), but also alleges willful infringement due to the defendant's continued disregard for SQIP’s intellectual property rights.

In its lawsuit, SQIP seeks several forms of relief, including a judgment confirming Ultra Stones' infringement, compensation for past and future damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284, ongoing royalties post-judgment, and a permanent injunction to prevent further violations. 

Additionally, SQIP requests that the court declare the case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285, enabling the company to recover attorneys' fees and other litigation costs due to what they describe as deliberate misconduct by Ultra Stones.

Representing SQIP is attorney Nicole L. Bohler of Long Tuminello LLP in Bay Shore, New York. The case is being heard under Case ID: 24-8401.

"false"
The South Shore Press
false

Organizations Included in this History


More News

Daily Feed

Local

Investors Throw Millions at Suffolk

The sale of $350 million in Tax Anticipation Notes at 2.94% and $46.4 million in Refunding Serial Bonds at 2.66% was reported by Comptroller John Kennedy. He attributes the impressive number of bidders to the county’s improved credit ratings which resulted in healthy competition, and significant cost savings for the residents of Suffolk County.


Local

History Comes Alive at Military Museum

The museum is the dream of the nearby Rocky Point VFW Post 6249 membership, whose stories are befitting of the many heroes depicted in the gallery’s hallowed halls. There’s museum advisor Joe Cognitore, the post’s commander, whose Army service in Vietnam earned him a Bronze Star with a “V” for Valor.


Local

Fort Sumter Pilgrimage Explores Family’s Civil War Legacy

Following the War of 1812 with Britain, President Andrew Jackson realized the need to strengthen the new nation’s coastal defenses, especially to protect the Atlantic entrance to Charleston, the south’s busiest port. Millions of tons of Massachusetts granite created an island at the confluence of the Ashley and the Cooper rivers where none had been before