House Report Details Biden Censorship


Judiciary Committee | Judiciary Committee

House Report Details Biden Censorship

The consequences of the Biden White House coercing media companies to suppress news were “disastrous” to the country, according to a report released by the House Judiciary Committee. “From unnecessary extended school closures to unconstitutional vaccine mandates that forced workers to take a newly developed vaccine or risk losing their jobs, the Biden Administration and other officials needlessly imposed harm and suffering on Americans across the country,” the report states.

According to Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, “By suppressing free speech and intentionally distorting public debate in the modern town square, ideas, and policies were no longer fairly tested and debated on their merits. Instead, policymakers implemented a series of public health measures that proved to be disastrous for the country.”

Labeled an “interim report,” with more expected to follow, the work details a months-long campaign by the Biden White House to coerce large companies, namely Meta (parent company of Facebook), Alphabet (parent company of YouTube), and Amazon, to censor books, videos, posts, and other content online. By the end of 2021, Facebook, YouTube, and Amazon changed their content moderation policies in ways that were directly responsive to criticism from the Biden Administration.”

Officially credited to the House Judiciary Committee and its Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, the report concluded the following:

  • Big Tech changed their content moderation policies because of the Biden White House
  • The Biden White House's censorship targeted true information, satire, and other content that did not violate the platforms' policies
  • The Biden White House's censorship campaign had a chilling effect on other speech
  • The White House had leverage because the companies had other policy concerns involving the Biden Administration
  • The Biden White House pushed censorship of books, not just social media
Ongoing litigation and the publication of the Twitter Files following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the company provided insight into the behind-the-scenes efforts of the Biden White House to censor political opponents and disfavored views, Jordan explained. For example, on the third day of the Biden Administration, the White House emailed Twitter (now X) personnel to demand that a tweet by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. be “removed ASAP.” The directive was not limited to just Kennedy; in the same email, the Biden White House asked Twitter to also “keep an eye out for tweets that fall in this same genre,” the report points out.

“But the most important documents to understanding the Biden White House’s censorship efforts have proven to be internal emails from the companies on the receiving end of White House threats and coercion,” the report goes on. After issuing dozens of subpoenas to Big Tech, government agencies, and relevant third parties, they obtained tens of thousands of documents illustrating the details of the Biden White House’s pressure campaign. Obtaining key internal company communications—often including the highest levels of company leadership—took additional escalatory measures, including threats to hold Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in contempt of Congress. Having obtained and reviewed the emails and other relevant nonpublic documents, the committee was able to paint a more complete picture of how and the extent to which the Biden White House coerced companies to suppress free speech.

Daily Feed

State

Push on for Tier 6 Pension Reform

Fix Tier 6 is the rallying cry in Albany as Albany works through the legislative session.


Local

Free Trees in the Town of Brookhaven

On Arbor Day (Friday, April 25), the Town of Brookhaven will hold its annual tree seedling, mulch, and compost giveaway in the South Parking Lot of Brookhaven Town Hall, located at 1 Independence Hill in Farmingville from 1:00-6:00 p.m.


Doctor sues New York homeowners' association for religious discrimination and harassment, seeks over $1 million in damages

A first responder and medical doctor is embroiled in a legal battle against his homeowners' association, alleging discrimination and harassment based on his religion.